# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (val) (Metrics: Acc, ASR, FGA)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (val) (Metrics: Acc, ASR, FGA)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-val-metrics-acc-asr-fga>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-11T06:13:55.023Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the validation split of the CIFAR-10 dataset, reporting standard Accuracy (Acc) alongside ASR and FGA metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (val) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-val-metrics-acc-asr-fga.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [ASR](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-val-metrics-acc-asr-fga.md?metric=ASR>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [FGA](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-val-metrics-acc-asr-fga.md?metric=FGA>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FGA | 87.8 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 87.8 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 87.8 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 87.8 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 78.9 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 78.9 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 78.9 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |
| FGA | 78.9 | Not recorded | 69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5 |

### FGA

Accuracy: 87.8. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4ac.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG-19","Attack Type":"BadNets","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 87.8. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4ad.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG-19","Attack Type":"Blend","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 87.8. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4ae.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG-19","Attack Type":"WaNet","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 87.8. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4af.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG-19","Attack Type":"Input-Aware","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 78.9. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4a8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Attack Type":"BadNets","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 78.9. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4a9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Attack Type":"Blend","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 78.9. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4aa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Attack Type":"WaNet","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FGA

Accuracy: 78.9. Result ID: 69b1080b6dbb7075b95aa4ab.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b0f7122d603e6de3e45da5.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Attack Type":"Input-Aware","Poison Rate":"10%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
