# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Transformation Robustness) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Transformation Robustness)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:10.210Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, focusing on accuracy under various geometric transformations (Rotation, Perspective) and data augmentation techniques (Cutout, MixUp). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (test) | | Metric | Accuracy (Base) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 11 of 11 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (Base)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Basic)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Rotation)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Perspective)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Grayscale)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Channel Shuffle)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Cutout)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (CutMix)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (MixUp)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (Base) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Clean | 83.93 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | CUDA\* | 65.47 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | TAP | 35.9 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | SEP | 28.43 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | NTGA | 27.6 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | EM | 21.43 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | REM | 21.36 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | AR | 16.89 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | SP | 16.06 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | PIL | 14.7 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | | CUDA | 10.35 | Not recorded | 697ae969a2b28e761d87cede | ### Clean Accuracy (Base): 83.93. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d185. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CUDA\* Accuracy (Base): 65.47. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d18c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Perturbation budget (epsilon)":"8/255"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TAP Accuracy (Base): 35.9. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d188. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SEP Accuracy (Base): 28.43. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d18d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NTGA Accuracy (Base): 27.6. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d18a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EM Accuracy (Base): 21.43. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d186. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### REM Accuracy (Base): 21.36. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d187. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AR Accuracy (Base): 16.89. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d18e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SP Accuracy (Base): 16.06. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d189. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PIL Accuracy (Base): 14.7. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d18f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CUDA Accuracy (Base): 10.35. Result ID: 69990c325698665ec471d18b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Perturbation budget":"original larger budget"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.