# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Original Accuracy & R-CLR)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Original Accuracy & R-CLR)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-original-accuracy-and-r-clr>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:54:20.661Z

Evaluation of Image Classification model performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, reporting Original Accuracy and R-CLR Accuracy metrics.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (test) |
| Metric | Original Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Original Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-original-accuracy-and-r-clr.md?metric=Original%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [R-CLR Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-original-accuracy-and-r-clr.md?metric=R-CLR%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Original Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| HRankPlus | 93.66 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |
| HRankPlus | 93.23 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |
| HRankPlus | 93.1 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |
| HRankPlus | 92.32 | Not recorded | 68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d |

### HRankPlus

Original Accuracy: 93.66. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a60c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67351e209131cea14bfc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"DenseNet-40","Params ↓ %":"61.9","FLOPs ↓ %":"59.9"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HRankPlus

Original Accuracy: 93.23. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a60b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67351e209131cea14bfc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-110","Params ↓ %":"68.3","FLOPs ↓ %":"71.6"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HRankPlus

Original Accuracy: 93.1. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a60d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67351e209131cea14bfc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"VGG-16","Params ↓ %":"87.3","FLOPs ↓ %":"78.6"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HRankPlus

Original Accuracy: 92.32. Result ID: 698def95ffc3901de099a60a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69e51e209131cea24a5d.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67351e209131cea14bfc.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-56","Params ↓ %":"70.0","FLOPs ↓ %":"74.1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.