# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (C15/Corruption Metrics)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (C15/Corruption Metrics)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-c15-corruption-metrics>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:31:50.388Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, focusing on accuracy metrics derived from corruption testing, including C15 and Mean Corruption Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-c15-corruption-metrics.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Corruption Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-c15-corruption-metrics.md?metric=Corruption%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [C15 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-c15-corruption-metrics.md?metric=C15%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Mean Corruption Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-test-c15-corruption-metrics.md?metric=Mean%20Corruption%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SYN+NST+TA (Ours+RE+N) | 97.01 | Not recorded | 69438aa5423ea422657295ea |
| NoisyMix | 96.86 | Not recorded | 69438aa5423ea422657295ea |
| NoisyMix | 96.73 | Not recorded | 69438aa5423ea422657295ea |

### SYN+NST+TA (Ours+RE+N)

Accuracy: 97.01. Result ID: 699835af5698665ec4914fe6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69438aa5423ea422657295ea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69438aa5423ea422657295ea.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"WRN-28-4","Training Epochs":"600"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NoisyMix

Accuracy: 96.86. Result ID: 699835af5698665ec4914fe5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69438aa5423ea422657295ea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c971e209131cea34af3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"WRN-28-4","Training Epochs":"600","Evaluation Protocol":"Original implementation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### NoisyMix

Accuracy: 96.73. Result ID: 699835af5698665ec4914fe4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69438aa5423ea422657295ea.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c971e209131cea34af3.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"WRN-28-4","Training Epochs":"600","Evaluation Protocol":"Robustbench"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.