# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Baseline, Pruned, FR/PR Evaluation) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Baseline, Pruned, FR/PR Evaluation)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:37:40.856Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, reporting baseline accuracy, accuracy after pruning, and specific robustness metrics (FR/PR). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (test) | | Metric | Baseline Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Baseline Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Pruned Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Top-1 Error Rate](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [False Rejection Rate (FR)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Precision Rate (PR)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Baseline Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | GAL-0.01 | 94.81 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | HRank | 94.81 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | DCT | 94.81 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | Chen et al. | 94.22 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | Li et al. | 94.19 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | Zhao et al. | 94.11 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | SCAP | 93.72 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | | SCAP | 93.72 | Not recorded | 6968749ee25ad2fa9d1ec65c | ### GAL-0.01 Baseline Accuracy: 94.81. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c0b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HRank Baseline Accuracy: 94.81. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c0e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DCT Baseline Accuracy: 94.81. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c0f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Chen et al. Baseline Accuracy: 94.22. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c10. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Li et al. Baseline Accuracy: 94.19. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c0c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Zhao et al. Baseline Accuracy: 94.11. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c0d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SCAP Baseline Accuracy: 93.72. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c11. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40","t":0.5}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SCAP Baseline Accuracy: 93.72. Result ID: 6997bf575698665ec4160c12. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"DenseNet-40","t":0.6}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.