# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Accuracy vs Noise Level) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (test) (Accuracy vs Noise Level)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:21.699Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, specifically measuring accuracy under varying levels of input noise (0.1 to 0.5). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (test) | | Metric | Accuracy (Noise 0.1) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 10 of 10 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (Noise 0.1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Noise 0.2)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Noise 0.3)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Noise 0.4)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Noise 0.5)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (Noise 0.1) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ROLT-DRW | 80.46 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | LDAM-DRW | 79.01 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | ROLT | 77.49 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | LDAM | 75.06 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | BBN | 72.86 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | NCM | 72.37 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | HAR-DRW | 72.12 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | ERM-DRW | 71.99 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | ERM | 69.33 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | | cRT | 69.22 | Not recorded | 68fa6a961e209131cea291d1 | ### ROLT-DRW Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 80.46. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f9e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LDAM-DRW Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 79.01. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f98. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ROLT Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 77.49. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f9d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LDAM Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 75.06. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f97. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### BBN Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 72.86. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f99. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### NCM Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 72.37. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f9b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HAR-DRW Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 72.12. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f9c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM-DRW Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 71.99. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f96. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 69.33. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f95. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### cRT Accuracy (Noise 0.1): 69.22. Result ID: 699ac3ca5698665ec4520f9a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"imbalance\_ratio":50}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.