# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 ordered pixel-by-pixel Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 ordered pixel-by-pixel]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:27:25.472Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 dataset using the specific 'ordered pixel-by-pixel' configuration. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 ordered pixel-by-pixel | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 10 of 10 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Lipschitz RNN using Euler | 64.2 | Not recorded | 68fa580c1e209131ce9aacb9 | | Lipschitz RNN using RK2 | 64.2 | Not recorded | 68fa580c1e209131ce9aacb9 | | AntisymmetricRNN w/ gating | 62.2 | Not recorded | 68fa65671e209131cea0a0c7 | | Lipschitz RNN using Euler | 60.5 | Not recorded | 68fa580c1e209131ce9aacb9 | | Lipschitz RNN using RK2 | 60.3 | Not recorded | 68fa580c1e209131ce9aacb9 | | LSTM baseline | 59.7 | Not recorded | 68fa580c1e209131ce9aacb9 | | LSTM | 59.7 | Not recorded | 68fa65671e209131cea0a0c7 | | Antisymmetric RNN | 58.7 | Not recorded | 68fa580c1e209131ce9aacb9 | | AntisymmetricRNN | 58.7 | Not recorded | 68fa65671e209131cea0a0c7 | | Ablation model | 54.6 | Not recorded | 68fa65671e209131cea0a0c7 | ### Lipschitz RNN using Euler Accuracy: 64.2. Result ID: 698ba2277a967eddb7703313. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":256,"# params":"134K/158K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lipschitz RNN using RK2 Accuracy: 64.2. Result ID: 698ba2277a967eddb7703314. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":256,"# params":"134K/158K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AntisymmetricRNN w/ gating Accuracy: 62.2. Result ID: 698caa138b517eb4331be4e0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# units":"256","# params":"37k"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lipschitz RNN using Euler Accuracy: 60.5. Result ID: 698ba2277a967eddb7703311. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":128,"# params":"34K/46K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lipschitz RNN using RK2 Accuracy: 60.3. Result ID: 698ba2277a967eddb7703312. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":128,"# params":"34K/46K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LSTM baseline Accuracy: 59.7. Result ID: 698ba2277a967eddb770330f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":128,"# params":"69K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### LSTM Accuracy: 59.7. Result ID: 698caa138b517eb4331be4dd. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# units":"128","# params":"69k"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Antisymmetric RNN Accuracy: 58.7. Result ID: 698ba2277a967eddb7703310. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"N":256,"# params":"36K"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AntisymmetricRNN Accuracy: 58.7. Result ID: 698caa138b517eb4331be4df. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# units":"256","# params":"36k"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Ablation model Accuracy: 54.6. Result ID: 698caa138b517eb4331be4de. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"# units":"196","# params":"42k"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.