# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (L-inf, epsilon=8/255, v1.0, test) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (L-inf, epsilon=8/255, v1.0, test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-27T08:38:37.566Z Evaluation of Image Classification robustness on the CIFAR-10 test set under an L-infinity adversarial threat model with epsilon=8/255 (version 1.0), reporting standard and robust accuracy. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 l\_inf threat model, epsilon=8/255 1.0 (test) | | Metric | Standard Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 11 of 11 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Standard Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Robust Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Standard Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ScoreOpt | 95.18 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | ScoreOpt | 95.02 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Wang et al. | 92.97 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Nie et al. | 90.43 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Nie et al. | 90.07 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Gowal et al. | 88.75 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Pang et al. | 88.62 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Gowal et al. | 88.54 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Gowal et al. | 87.51 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Yoon et al. | 86.76 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | | Yoon et al. | 85.66 | Not recorded | 68fa71031e209131cea4e879 | ### ScoreOpt Standard Accuracy: 95.18. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e6692f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AP","Architecture":"WideResNet-70-16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ScoreOpt Standard Accuracy: 95.02. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e6692a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AP","Architecture":"WideResNet-28-10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Wang et al. Standard Accuracy: 92.97. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e6692c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AT","Architecture":"WideResNet-70-16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Nie et al. Standard Accuracy: 90.43. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e6692e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AP","Architecture":"WideResNet-70-16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Nie et al. Standard Accuracy: 90.07. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e66929. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AP","Architecture":"WideResNet-28-10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gowal et al. Standard Accuracy: 88.75. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e6692b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AT","Architecture":"WideResNet-70-16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Pang et al. Standard Accuracy: 88.62. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e66925. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AT","Architecture":"WideResNet-28-10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gowal et al. Standard Accuracy: 88.54. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e66926. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AT","Architecture":"WideResNet-28-10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Gowal et al. Standard Accuracy: 87.51. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e66927. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AT","Architecture":"WideResNet-28-10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yoon et al. Standard Accuracy: 86.76. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e6692d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AP","Architecture":"WideResNet-70-16"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yoon et al. Standard Accuracy: 85.66. Result ID: 69a157f535dfcabb00e66928. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Type":"AP","Architecture":"WideResNet-28-10"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.