# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 Dir(0.5) (New Clients) (Corruption Robustness)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 Dir(0.5) (New Clients) (Corruption Robustness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-13T08:12:28.429Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on CIFAR-10 data partitioned using a Dirichlet distribution (alpha=0.5) across new clients, measured across various image corruption levels (e.g., motion blur, fog, noise).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 Dir(0.5) (New Clients) |
| Metric | Accuracy (Clean) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (Clean)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Clean)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Motion Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Motion%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Defocus Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Defocus%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Gaussian Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Shot Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Shot%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Impulse Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Impulse%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Frost)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Frost)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Fog)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Fog)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (JPEG Compression)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(JPEG%20Compression)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Brightness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Brightness)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (Contrast)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-dir-0-5-new-clients-corruption-robustness.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Contrast)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (Clean) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| pFedFDA | 72.94 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| pFedGM | 72.94 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| FedAvgFT | 72.31 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| FedPAC | 72.15 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| pFedMe | 67.25 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| LG-FedAvg | 63.77 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| FedBAU | 61.87 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |
| FedAvg | 59.18 | Not recorded | 69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9 |

### pFedFDA

Accuracy (Clean): 72.94. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db716.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75761e209131cea68190.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### pFedGM

Accuracy (Clean): 72.94. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db717.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvgFT

Accuracy (Clean): 72.31. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db711.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedPAC

Accuracy (Clean): 72.15. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db715.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6fc81e209131cea4759f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### pFedMe

Accuracy (Clean): 67.25. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db713.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ba21e209131cea2f6fd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LG-FedAvg

Accuracy (Clean): 63.77. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db714.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67e81e209131cea190ee.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedBAU

Accuracy (Clean): 61.87. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db712.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfa1e209131cea31630.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvg

Accuracy (Clean): 59.18. Result ID: 69b3c6dd47f34ce9249db710.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69b399f50636e5bf4afbc9a9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Partition":"Dirichlet (0.5)","Client Type":"New Clients (Generalization)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
