# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (Convergence Rounds Evaluation)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (Convergence Rounds Evaluation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-convergence-rounds-evaluation>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-27T09:04:33.261Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on CIFAR-10, focusing on the number of training rounds required to achieve specific accuracy targets.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 |
| Metric | Accuracy @ 500 Rounds |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 13 of 13 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy @ 500 Rounds](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-convergence-rounds-evaluation.md?metric=Accuracy%20%40%20500%20Rounds>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy @ 1000 Rounds](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-convergence-rounds-evaluation.md?metric=Accuracy%20%40%201000%20Rounds>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Rounds to reach 82% Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-convergence-rounds-evaluation.md?metric=Rounds%20to%20reach%2082%25%20Accuracy>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Rounds to reach 89% Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-convergence-rounds-evaluation.md?metric=Rounds%20to%20reach%2089%25%20Accuracy>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy @ 500 Rounds | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FedACG | 90.57 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedDC | 90.07 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedDyn | 89.19 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| MOON | 88.24 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedAvgM | 87.67 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedCM | 87.38 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedMLB | 86.32 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedNTD | 85.68 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedADAM | 85.29 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedAvg | 85.28 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedDecorr | 85.21 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedProx | 84.79 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |
| FedLC | 84.48 | Not recorded | 68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7 |

### FedACG

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 90.57. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6964e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/ninigapa0/FedAGM>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedDC

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 90.07. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6964c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c0d1e209131cea31b80.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/gaoliang13/FedDC>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedDyn

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 89.19. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69646.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b361e209131cea2cecf.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MOON

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 88.24. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69647.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fca.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/QinbinLi/MOON>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvgM

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 87.67. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69644.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66581e209131cea0faa1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedCM

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 87.38. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69648.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a3d1e209131cea26ed8.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedMLB

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 86.32. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69649.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d031e209131cea3754a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedNTD

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 85.68. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6964b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e061e209131cea3d7a5.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Lee-Gihun/FedNTD>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedADAM

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 85.29. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69645.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa58711e209131ce9ae27a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedAvg

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 85.28. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69642.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e761e209131cea40072.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedDecorr

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 85.21. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6964d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72d61e209131cea58d02.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedProx

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 84.79. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e69643.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67701e209131cea163fe.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FedLC

Accuracy @ 500 Rounds: 84.48. Result ID: 69a15e1b35dfcabb00e6964a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72b01e209131cea57eb7.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6d851e209131cea3a601.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Data Distribution":"i.i.d.","Number of Clients":"100","Participation Rate":"5%"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
