# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 Asymmetric 30% noise (test)

Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 Asymmetric 30% noise (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-asymmetric-30-percent-noise-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:31:43.358Z

Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the test split of CIFAR-10 corrupted specifically with 30% asymmetric noise.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 Asymmetric 30% noise (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-on-cifar-10-asymmetric-30-percent-noise-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DPS+ | 96.3 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| DULC | 95.5 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| DPS | 93.2 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| TE | 92.86 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| MixUp | 88.26 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| SL | 86.39 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| LS | 86.1 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |
| Baseline | 85.23 | Not recorded | 6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90 |

### DPS+

Accuracy: 96.3. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512ca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"PreAct ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DULC

Accuracy: 95.5. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"PreAct ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DPS

Accuracy: 93.2. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### TE

Accuracy: 92.86. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63301e209131ce9fd2e9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MixUp

Accuracy: 88.26. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa644e1e209131cea03e44.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/facebookresearch/mixup-cifar10>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SL

Accuracy: 86.39. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa66351e209131cea0ec32.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LS

Accuracy: 86.1. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62331e209131ce9f8333.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Baseline

Accuracy: 85.23. Result ID: 6997fba05698665ec45512c3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6955ff5e53fdd5c36173dd90.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.