# Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (Adversarial Robustness PGD/APGD) Source: [Image Classification on CIFAR-10 (Adversarial Robustness PGD/APGD)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-23T11:14:19.275Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 dataset focusing specifically on robustness against common adversarial attacks, reporting clean accuracy alongside metrics derived from Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) and Adaptive Projected Gradient Descent (APGD) perturbations. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 | | Metric | Clean Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 12 of 12 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Clean Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [PGD-20 Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [APGD-CE Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [APGD-DLR Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Clean Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Base | 91.21 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | ConjMask (Exp. 3) | 89.5 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | Base | 88.86 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | ConjMask (Exp. 3) | 86.67 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | ConjMask+LogitReg (Exp. 4) | 84.91 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | ConjMask+LogitReg (Exp. 4) | 83.62 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | Base | 83.37 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | ConjMask (Exp. 3) | 83.01 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | ConjMask+LogitReg (Exp. 4) | 77.86 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | TRADES-PGD | 74.57 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | TRADES-PGD | 71.95 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | | TRADES-PGD | 56.88 | Not recorded | 69c0c90e0636e5bf4afc3c63 | ### Base Clean Accuracy: 91.21. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a97884. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConjMask (Exp. 3) Clean Accuracy: 89.5. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a97886. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"20"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Base Clean Accuracy: 88.86. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a9788c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"EfficientNet-B0"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConjMask (Exp. 3) Clean Accuracy: 86.67. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a9788e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"EfficientNet-B0","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"70"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConjMask+LogitReg (Exp. 4) Clean Accuracy: 84.91. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a9788f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"EfficientNet-B0","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"55"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConjMask+LogitReg (Exp. 4) Clean Accuracy: 83.62. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a97887. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"30"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Base Clean Accuracy: 83.37. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a97888. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ViT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConjMask (Exp. 3) Clean Accuracy: 83.01. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a9788a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ViT","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"50"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConjMask+LogitReg (Exp. 4) Clean Accuracy: 77.86. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a9788b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ViT","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"70"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TRADES-PGD Clean Accuracy: 74.57. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a97885. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ResNet-18","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"100"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TRADES-PGD Clean Accuracy: 71.95. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a97889. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"ViT","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"120"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TRADES-PGD Clean Accuracy: 56.88. Result ID: 69c11f5447f34ce924a9788d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model":"EfficientNet-B0","Timing (Sec. × 200)":"260"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.