# Image Classification and Uncertainty Estimation on CIFAR-100 (test)

Source: [Image Classification and Uncertainty Estimation on CIFAR-100 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-and-uncertainty-estimation-on-cifar-100-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-05-04T07:47:29.495Z

Evaluation of combined Image Classification performance and Uncertainty Estimation capabilities (including confidence estimation and Out-of-Distribution detection against SVHN and TinyImageNet) on the CIFAR-100 test set.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Classification and Uncertainty Estimation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-100 (test) |
| Metric | Test Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Test Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-and-uncertainty-estimation-on-cifar-100-test.md?metric=Test%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AUPR (Confidence Estimation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-and-uncertainty-estimation-on-cifar-100-test.md?metric=AUPR%20(Confidence%20Estimation)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AUPR (OOD SVHN)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-and-uncertainty-estimation-on-cifar-100-test.md?metric=AUPR%20(OOD%20SVHN)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AUPR (OOD TinyImageNet)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-classification-and-uncertainty-estimation-on-cifar-100-test.md?metric=AUPR%20(OOD%20TinyImageNet)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Test Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DAPPr | 70.85 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |
| F-EDL | 69.4 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |
| I-EDL | 66.38 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |
| DAEDL | 66.01 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |
| MC Dropout | 65.94 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |
| R-EDL | 63.53 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |
| EDL | 45.91 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae |

### DAPPr

Test Accuracy: 70.85. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbfd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### F-EDL

Test Accuracy: 69.4. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbfc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c521e209131cea8d8a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### I-EDL

Test Accuracy: 66.38. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c521e209131cea8d8a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAEDL

Test Accuracy: 66.01. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbfb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c521e209131cea8d8a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MC Dropout

Test Accuracy: 65.94. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c521e209131cea8d8a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### R-EDL

Test Accuracy: 63.53. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbfa.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c521e209131cea8d8a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EDL

Test Accuracy: 45.91. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7c521e209131cea8d8a2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.