# Image Classification and Uncertainty Estimation on CIFAR-10 (test) Source: [Image Classification and Uncertainty Estimation on CIFAR-10 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-04T07:47:29.465Z Evaluation of Image Classification performance on the CIFAR-10 test set, reporting standard accuracy alongside metrics for confidence estimation and Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection capabilities. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Image Classification and Uncertainty Estimation | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR-10 (test) | | Metric | Accuracy (Test) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (Test)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [AUPR (Confidence Estimation)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [AUPR (OOD Detection: SVHN)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [AUPR (OOD Detection: CIFAR-100)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (Test) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | DAPPr | 92 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | | F-EDL | 91.19 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | | DAEDL | 91.11 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | | R-EDL | 90.09 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | | I-EDL | 89.2 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | | EDL | 83.55 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | | MC Dropout | 82.84 | Not recorded | 69f827e2c0f56ed8430888ae | ### DAPPr Accuracy (Test): 92. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### F-EDL Accuracy (Test): 91.19. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DAEDL Accuracy (Test): 91.11. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### R-EDL Accuracy (Test): 90.09. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### I-EDL Accuracy (Test): 89.2. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EDL Accuracy (Test): 83.55. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MC Dropout Accuracy (Test): 82.84. Result ID: 69f84efd47f34ce924dbbbf0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.