# Image Aesthetics Assessment on Image Aesthetics dataset

Source: [Image Aesthetics Assessment on Image Aesthetics dataset](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:26:51.623Z

Evaluation of image aesthetic assessment performance on the Image Aesthetics dataset, measured using category-specific Accuracy and Mean Absolute Error (MAE).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Image Aesthetics Assessment |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Image Aesthetics dataset |
| Metric | Acc (Nature) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Acc (Nature)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=Acc%20(Nature)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Acc (Animal)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=Acc%20(Animal)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Acc (Urban)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=Acc%20(Urban)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Acc (People)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=Acc%20(People)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Acc (Overall)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=Acc%20(Overall)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [MAE (Nature)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=MAE%20(Nature)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [MAE (Animal)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=MAE%20(Animal)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [MAE (Urban)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=MAE%20(Urban)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [MAE (People)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=MAE%20(People)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [MAE (Overall)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/image-aesthetics-assessment-on-image-aesthetics-dataset.md?metric=MAE%20(Overall)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Acc (Nature) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Ranking + POE | 74.4 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| Classification + POE | 73.62 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| SORD | 73.59 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| D-Regression + POE | 73.44 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| CNNPOR | 71.86 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| D-Regression | 71.52 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| Classification | 70.97 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |
| Ranking | 69.81 | Not recorded | 68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2 |

### Ranking + POE

Acc (Nature): 74.4. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a0c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Li-Wanhua/POEs>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"probabilistic ordinal embeddings":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Classification + POE

Acc (Nature): 73.62. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a0a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Li-Wanhua/POEs>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"probabilistic ordinal embeddings":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SORD

Acc (Nature): 73.59. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a06.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### D-Regression + POE

Acc (Nature): 73.44. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a08.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Li-Wanhua/POEs>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"probabilistic ordinal embeddings":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CNNPOR

Acc (Nature): 71.86. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a05.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### D-Regression

Acc (Nature): 71.52. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a07.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Classification

Acc (Nature): 70.97. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a09.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ranking

Acc (Nature): 69.81. Result ID: 698dc17a8b517eb433238a0b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa699a1e209131cea22fd2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
