# Hyperspectral Image Classification on CASI University of Houston (test)

Source: [Hyperspectral Image Classification on CASI University of Houston (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:54:25.860Z

Evaluation of Hyperspectral Image Classification performance on the test split of the CASI University of Houston dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Hyperspectral Image Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CASI University of Houston (test) |
| Metric | Overall Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Overall Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Overall%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 1 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%201%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 2 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%202%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 3 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%203%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 4 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%204%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 5 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%205%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 6 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%206%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 7 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%207%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 8 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%208%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 9 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%209%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 10 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%2010%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 11 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%2011%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 12 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%2012%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 13 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%2013%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 14 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%2014%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Class 15 Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Class%2015%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Average Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Average%20Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Kappa Coefficient](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/hyperspectral-image-classification-on-casi-university-of-houston-test.md?metric=Kappa%20Coefficient>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Overall Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| FreeNet | 86.61 | Not recorded | 68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd |
| DFFN | 84.56 | Not recorded | 68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd |
| Gabor-CNN | 84.32 | Not recorded | 68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd |
| S-CNN | 82.34 | Not recorded | 68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd |
| CMTL | 81.38 | Not recorded | 69802f61a8b01e76cc8e1498 |
| 3D-GAN | 78.16 | Not recorded | 68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd |
| GMTN | 77.2 | Not recorded | 69802f61a8b01e76cc8e1498 |
| SVM | 76.88 | Not recorded | 68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd |

### FreeNet

Overall Accuracy: 86.61. Result ID: 698d7e9a8b517eb43321ef17.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Z-Zheng/FreeNet>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Input Patch Strategy":"Patch-free"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DFFN

Overall Accuracy: 84.56. Result ID: 698d7e9a8b517eb43321ef15.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Input Patch Strategy":"Patch-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gabor-CNN

Overall Accuracy: 84.32. Result ID: 698d7e9a8b517eb43321ef14.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Input Patch Strategy":"Patch-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### S-CNN

Overall Accuracy: 82.34. Result ID: 698d7e9a8b517eb43321ef13.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Input Patch Strategy":"Patch-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CMTL

Overall Accuracy: 81.38. Result ID: 699774285698665ec4c83e59.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69802f61a8b01e76cc8e1498.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"labeled samples per class":5}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### 3D-GAN

Overall Accuracy: 78.16. Result ID: 698d7e9a8b517eb43321ef16.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Input Patch Strategy":"Patch-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GMTN

Overall Accuracy: 77.2. Result ID: 699774285698665ec4c83e58.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69802f61a8b01e76cc8e1498.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"labeled samples per class":5}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SVM

Overall Accuracy: 76.88. Result ID: 698d7e9a8b517eb43321ef12.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68b71e209131cea1dabd.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Input Patch Strategy":"Patch-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
