# Human Inspection on ImageNet Clean images (test)

Source: [Human Inspection on ImageNet Clean images (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/human-inspection-on-imagenet-clean-images-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:04:54.536Z

Evaluation of model performance based on human inspection criteria using the test split of the ImageNet Clean dataset, measured by the success fooling rate.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Human Inspection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Clean images (test) |
| Metric | Success Fooling Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Success Fooling Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/human-inspection-on-imagenet-clean-images-test.md?metric=Success%20Fooling%20Rate>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Success Fooling Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SSLBKD | 7.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| BadEncoder/DRUPE | 8.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| Ins-Kelvin | 10.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| POIENC | 16.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| ISSBA | 26.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| CTRL | 27.2 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| BLTO | 27.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| Ours | 48.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |

### SSLBKD

Success Fooling Rate: 7.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbcc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cb61e209131cea3573f.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/UMBCvision/SSL-Backdoor>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BadEncoder/DRUPE

Success Fooling Rate: 8.8. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbce.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a7c1e209131cea288c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ins-Kelvin

Success Fooling Rate: 10.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### POIENC

Success Fooling Rate: 16.8. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbcf.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e461e209131cea3ee4f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ISSBA

Success Fooling Rate: 26.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f6e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CTRL

Success Fooling Rate: 27.2. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbcd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa705b1e209131cea4a910.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BLTO

Success Fooling Rate: 27.6. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72df1e209131cea5912b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ours

Success Fooling Rate: 48.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Zhang-Henry/IMPERATIVE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.