# Human Inspection on ImageNet Both (test)

Source: [Human Inspection on ImageNet Both (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/human-inspection-on-imagenet-both-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:04:54.553Z

Evaluation of human inspection performance on the combined ImageNet test set, measuring the success fooling rate, likely in the context of adversarial robustness or backdoor detection.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Human Inspection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Both (test) |
| Metric | Success Fooling Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Success Fooling Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/human-inspection-on-imagenet-both-test.md?metric=Success%20Fooling%20Rate>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Success Fooling Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SSLBKD | 4.9 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| BadEncoder/DRUPE | 6.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| Ins-Kelvin | 11.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| POIENC | 13.2 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| BLTO | 25 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| ISSBA | 25.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| CTRL | 29.2 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| Ours | 49.5 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |

### SSLBKD

Success Fooling Rate: 4.9. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cb61e209131cea3573f.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/UMBCvision/SSL-Backdoor>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BadEncoder/DRUPE

Success Fooling Rate: 6.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a7c1e209131cea288c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ins-Kelvin

Success Fooling Rate: 11.6. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### POIENC

Success Fooling Rate: 13.2. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e461e209131cea3ee4f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BLTO

Success Fooling Rate: 25. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72df1e209131cea5912b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ISSBA

Success Fooling Rate: 25.6. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbda.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f6e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CTRL

Success Fooling Rate: 29.2. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbd5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa705b1e209131cea4a910.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ours

Success Fooling Rate: 49.5. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbdb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Zhang-Henry/IMPERATIVE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.