# Human Inspection on ImageNet Backdoor images (test)

Source: [Human Inspection on ImageNet Backdoor images (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/human-inspection-on-imagenet-backdoor-images-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T06:04:54.518Z

Evaluation of human inspection performance on the test set derived from ImageNet backdoor images, measuring the success fooling rate.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Human Inspection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ImageNet Backdoor images (test) |
| Metric | Success Fooling Rate |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Success Fooling Rate](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/human-inspection-on-imagenet-backdoor-images-test.md?metric=Success%20Fooling%20Rate>): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Success Fooling Rate | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SSLBKD | 2.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| BadEncoder/DRUPE | 4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| POIENC | 9.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| Ins-Kelvin | 12.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| BLTO | 22.4 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| ISSBA | 24.8 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| CTRL | 31.2 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |
| Ours | 50.6 | Not recorded | 68fa77c81e209131cea754f1 |

### SSLBKD

Success Fooling Rate: 2.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbc4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6cb61e209131cea3573f.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/UMBCvision/SSL-Backdoor>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BadEncoder/DRUPE

Success Fooling Rate: 4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbc6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a7c1e209131cea288c2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### POIENC

Success Fooling Rate: 9.6. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbc7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e461e209131cea3ee4f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ins-Kelvin

Success Fooling Rate: 12.8. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbc8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### BLTO

Success Fooling Rate: 22.4. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbc9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72df1e209131cea5912b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ISSBA

Success Fooling Rate: 24.8. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6a921e209131cea28f6e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CTRL

Success Fooling Rate: 31.2. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbc5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa705b1e209131cea4a910.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Ours

Success Fooling Rate: 50.6. Result ID: 699569013badfaffe65ccbcb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77c81e209131cea754f1.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Zhang-Henry/IMPERATIVE>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.