# Histopathology Prostate Cancer Grading on SICAP C v2

Source: [Histopathology Prostate Cancer Grading on SICAP C v2](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-20T08:35:59.478Z

Evaluation of histopathology prostate cancer grading performance on the SICAP C v2 dataset, assessed across various image quality degradations and noise levels (e.g., Gaussian noise, blur, fog).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Histopathology prostate cancer grading |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | SICAP C v2 |
| Metric | Accuracy (Gaussian Noise) |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 7 of 7 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (Gaussian Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Shot Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Shot%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Impulse Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Impulse%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Speckle Noise)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Speckle%20Noise)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Average Noise Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Average%20Noise%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Defocus)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Defocus)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Gaussian Blur)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Gaussian%20Blur)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Average Blur Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Average%20Blur%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Brightness)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Brightness)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Fog)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Fog)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Frost)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Frost)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Average Weather Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Average%20Weather%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Contrast)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Contrast)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Elastic Distortion)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Elastic%20Distortion)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (JPEG Compression)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(JPEG%20Compression)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Accuracy (Pixelation)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Accuracy%20(Pixelation)>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Average Digital Artifact Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Average%20Digital%20Artifact%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Overall Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/histopathology-prostate-cancer-grading-on-sicap-c-v2.md?metric=Overall%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (Gaussian Noise) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| ProtoTTA | 59.4 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |
| Memo | 58.5 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |
| EATA | 58.3 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |
| ProtoTTA+ | 58.3 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |
| SAR | 58.2 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |
| Tent | 56.6 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |
| Unadapted | 16.4 | Not recorded | 69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99 |

### ProtoTTA

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 59.4. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1a9f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Memo

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 58.5. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1a9b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6da51e209131cea3b236.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### EATA

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 58.3. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1a9e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6ca11e209131cea35123.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ProtoTTA+

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 58.3. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1aa0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SAR

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 58.2. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1a9c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e961e209131cea40e77.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Tent

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 56.6. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1a9d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69941e209131cea22d2b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Unadapted

Accuracy (Gaussian Noise): 16.4. Result ID: 69e5e56c47f34ce924cc1a9a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e5b30a7d0172140ec7df99.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Backbone":"ProtoPNet (BN + 1×1 Convs)"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
