# Handwritten Digit Recognition on MNIST

Source: [Handwritten Digit Recognition on MNIST](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handwritten-digit-recognition-on-mnist>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-17T09:10:30.398Z

Evaluation of Handwritten Digit Recognition performance on the MNIST dataset, reporting standard classification metrics like Accuracy and F1-score.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Handwritten Digit Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | MNIST |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handwritten-digit-recognition-on-mnist.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handwritten-digit-recognition-on-mnist.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| SDRDL | 98.13 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| JLSPCADL | 96.99 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| PCA+SCMLP | 96.5 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| PCA+SEDL | 94.43 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| PCA+LCKSVD | 93.6 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| JDDRDL | 88.21 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |

### SDRDL

Accuracy: 98.13. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4cb.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### JLSPCADL

Accuracy: 96.99. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4cc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA+SCMLP

Accuracy: 96.5. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4c9.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA+SEDL

Accuracy: 94.43. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4c8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa612c1e209131ce9f2f41.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA+LCKSVD

Accuracy: 93.6. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4c7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### JDDRDL

Accuracy: 88.21. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4ca.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.