# Handwritten Digit Recognition on ARDIS

Source: [Handwritten Digit Recognition on ARDIS](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handwritten-digit-recognition-on-ardis>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-17T09:10:30.424Z

Evaluation of Handwritten Digit Recognition performance on the ARDIS dataset, reporting standard classification metrics like Accuracy and F1-score.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Handwritten Digit Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ARDIS |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handwritten-digit-recognition-on-ardis.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1-score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handwritten-digit-recognition-on-ardis.md?metric=F1-score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| JLSPCADL | 95.6 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| SDRDL | 94.71 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| PCA+SCMLP | 94.12 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| JDDRDL | 93.65 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| PCA+SEDL | 93.24 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |
| PCA+LCKSVD | 90.9 | Not recorded | 68fa75151e209131cea65999 |

### JLSPCADL

Accuracy: 95.6. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4d8.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SDRDL

Accuracy: 94.71. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4d7.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA+SCMLP

Accuracy: 94.12. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4d5.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### JDDRDL

Accuracy: 93.65. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4d6.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA+SEDL

Accuracy: 93.24. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4d4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa612c1e209131ce9f2f41.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PCA+LCKSVD

Accuracy: 90.9. Result ID: 69b919e747f34ce924a1e4d3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75151e209131cea65999.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Evaluation Protocol":"Three-fold cross-validation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.