# Handover Direction Classification on Kidney Transplant Procedure Dataset (test)

Source: [Handover Direction Classification on Kidney Transplant Procedure Dataset (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handover-direction-classification-on-kidney-transplant-procedure-dataset-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-10T07:28:45.695Z

Evaluation of Handover Direction Classification performance on the test split of the Kidney Transplant Procedure Dataset, reporting F1 scores for specific directions (R, G) and the mean.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Handover Direction Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Kidney Transplant Procedure Dataset (test) |
| Metric | F1 Score (R) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [F1 Score (R)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handover-direction-classification-on-kidney-transplant-procedure-dataset-test.md?metric=F1%20Score%20(R)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score (G)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handover-direction-classification-on-kidney-transplant-procedure-dataset-test.md?metric=F1%20Score%20(G)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Mean F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/handover-direction-classification-on-kidney-transplant-procedure-dataset-test.md?metric=Mean%20F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | F1 Score (R) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Multi-task ViT–LSTM | 70 | Not recorded | 69d883e57d0172140ec7784b |
| VideoMamba | 60 | Not recorded | 69d883e57d0172140ec7784b |
| Single-task ViT–LSTM | 55 | Not recorded | 69d883e57d0172140ec7784b |

### Multi-task ViT–LSTM

F1 Score (R): 70. Result ID: 69d8a62647f34ce924c12576.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d883e57d0172140ec7784b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d883e57d0172140ec7784b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"temporal input":"8 sampled frames per sequence","aggregation":"Gaussian-weighted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### VideoMamba

F1 Score (R): 60. Result ID: 69d8a62647f34ce924c12578.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d883e57d0172140ec7784b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72831e209131cea56ea1.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/OpenGVLab/VideoMamba>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"temporal input":"8 sampled frames per sequence","aggregation":"Gaussian-weighted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Single-task ViT–LSTM

F1 Score (R): 55. Result ID: 69d8a62647f34ce924c12577.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d883e57d0172140ec7784b.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d883e57d0172140ec7784b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"temporal input":"8 sampled frames per sequence","aggregation":"Gaussian-weighted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
