# Geometric Concept Classification on Geoclidean Constraints 1.0 (test)

Source: [Geometric Concept Classification on Geoclidean Constraints 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/geometric-concept-classification-on-geoclidean-constraints-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:28:51.578Z

Evaluation of Geometric Concept Classification performance on the test split of the Geoclidean Constraints 1.0 dataset, measured using Accuracy.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Geometric Concept Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Geoclidean Constraints 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/geometric-concept-classification-on-geoclidean-constraints-1-0-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| E(2)-CNN | 71.03 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| LtD-diff | 57.26 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| CE | 53.89 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| LBS (CE) | 50.01 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| LBS | 47.43 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| SupCon | 42.41 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| SimCLR | 32.04 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| HoG | 23.82 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| GeoSSL | 18.66 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |
| B-TCVAE | 17.18 | Not recorded | 68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f |

### E(2)-CNN

Accuracy: 71.03. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c31484902297e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69ac1e209131cea23410.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/QUVA-Lab/e2cnn>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LtD-diff

Accuracy: 57.26. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c31484902297d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6b351e209131cea2ce92.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/Ddaniela13/LearningToDraw>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CE

Accuracy: 53.89. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c31484902297b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LBS (CE)

Accuracy: 50.01. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c31484902297f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### LBS

Accuracy: 47.43. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c314849022984.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SupCon

Accuracy: 42.41. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c31484902297c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa697f1e209131cea22756.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SimCLR

Accuracy: 32.04. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c314849022980.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67d71e209131cea18de5.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/google-research/simclr>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HoG

Accuracy: 23.82. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c314849022983.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GeoSSL

Accuracy: 18.66. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c314849022982.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa642d1e209131cea0328c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### B-TCVAE

Accuracy: 17.18. Result ID: 6990a6e43a6c314849022981.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6f161e209131cea43d0f.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65a91e209131cea0bb81.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Label":"false"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.