# Generalized Domain Adaptation Few-Shot Open-Set Recognition on DomainNet Real to Clipart (meta-test)

Source: [Generalized Domain Adaptation Few-Shot Open-Set Recognition on DomainNet Real to Clipart (meta-test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/generalized-domain-adaptation-few-shot-open-set-recognition-on-domainnet-real-to-clipart-meta-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:33:56.606Z

Evaluation of Generalized Domain Adaptation Few-Shot Open-Set Recognition performance on the DomainNet dataset, specifically testing the transfer from the Real domain to the Clipart domain using the meta-test split.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Generalized Domain Adaptation Few-Shot Open-Set Recognition |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | DomainNet Real to Clipart (meta-test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (%) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 4 of 4 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/generalized-domain-adaptation-few-shot-open-set-recognition-on-domainnet-real-to-clipart-meta-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(%25)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AUROC (%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/generalized-domain-adaptation-few-shot-open-set-recognition-on-domainnet-real-to-clipart-meta-test.md?metric=AUROC%20(%25)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (%) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| DAFOS-NET | 52.92 | Not recorded | 68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef |
| MORGAN + DAPN | 38.23 | Not recorded | 68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef |
| MORGAN | 32.25 | Not recorded | 68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef |
| DAPN | 29.25 | Not recorded | 68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef |

### DAFOS-NET

Accuracy (%): 52.92. Result ID: 699156c13a6c314849076f16.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/DebabrataPal7/DAFOSNET>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"K":5,"shot":5,"Query sampled from":"S + T"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MORGAN + DAPN

Accuracy (%): 38.23. Result ID: 699156c13a6c314849076f15.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"K":5,"shot":5,"Query sampled from":"S + T"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MORGAN

Accuracy (%): 32.25. Result ID: 699156c13a6c314849076f13.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"K":5,"shot":5,"Query sampled from":"S + T"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DAPN

Accuracy (%): 29.25. Result ID: 699156c13a6c314849076f14.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa70be1e209131cea4cfef.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67361e209131cea14d58.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"K":5,"shot":5,"Query sampled from":"S + T"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.