# Fundus image grading on APTOS Sources-imbalanced Source: [Fundus image grading on APTOS Sources-imbalanced]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:54:01.567Z Evaluation of model performance for Fundus image grading using the APTOS Sources-imbalanced dataset, reporting metrics such as Overall Accuracy (OA), Mean Accuracy (mAcc), F1, and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Fundus image grading | | Dataset (including any stated split) | APTOS Sources-imbalanced | | Metric | OA | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 9 of 9 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [OA](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [mAcc](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [MAE](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | OA | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | ResNet50 | 82.81 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | ResNet50 | 82.34 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | RKD | 74.61 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | UMKD | 74.61 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | ResNet18 | 74.21 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | SDD | 73.44 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | KD | 73.04 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | DKD | 70.7 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | | FitNet | 67.57 | Not recorded | 68fa78531e209131cea77b7f | ### ResNet50 OA: 82.81. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model type":"Exp2"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ResNet50 OA: 82.34. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model type":"Exp1"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RKD OA: 74.61. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb7. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"KD Category":"Feature-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UMKD OA: 74.61. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fbb. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"KD Category":"Output-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ResNet18 OA: 74.21. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Model type":"Supervised"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SDD OA: 73.44. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fba. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"KD Category":"Output-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### KD OA: 73.04. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb8. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"KD Category":"Output-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DKD OA: 70.7. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb9. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"KD Category":"Output-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FitNet OA: 67.57. Result ID: 699585983badfaffe67e4fb6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"KD Category":"Feature-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.