# Forward Simulation on Forward Simulation (test) Source: [Forward Simulation on Forward Simulation (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:28:25.603Z Evaluation of model performance on the test split of the Forward Simulation dataset, focusing on the Forward Simulation task. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Forward Simulation | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Forward Simulation (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 12 of 12 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | SimEvals | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 99.8 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 94.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 94.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 93.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 93.5 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 89.2 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 88.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 85.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 83.7 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | | SimEvals | 82.3 | Not recorded | 68fa6d4a1e209131cea38cc4 | ### SimEvals Accuracy: 100. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa14. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"LIME","Train Set Size":100,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 100. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa15. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"LIME","Train Set Size":1000,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 99.8. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa13. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"LIME","Train Set Size":32,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 94.7. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa18. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"Anchors","Train Set Size":100,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 94.2. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa12. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"LIME","Train Set Size":16,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 93.7. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa19. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"Anchors","Train Set Size":1000,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 93.5. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa17. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"Anchors","Train Set Size":32,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 89.2. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa16. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"Anchors","Train Set Size":16,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 88.7. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa1d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"None","Train Set Size":1000,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 85.7. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa1c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"None","Train Set Size":100,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 83.7. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa1b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"None","Train Set Size":32,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### SimEvals Accuracy: 82.3. Result ID: 698f855d3a6c314849f9aa1a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Explanation":"None","Train Set Size":16,"Subject Type":"Algorithmic Agent"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.