# Flagging high human disagreement cases on Measuring Hate Speech corpus

Source: [Flagging high human disagreement cases on Measuring Hate Speech corpus](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/flagging-high-human-disagreement-cases-on-measuring-hate-speech-corpus>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-07T08:31:06.375Z

Evaluation of model performance on the Measuring Hate Speech corpus, specifically focusing on flagging cases where human annotators strongly disagreed, measured using Precision, Recall, and F1 scores.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Flagging high human disagreement cases |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Measuring Hate Speech corpus |
| Metric | Precision (High Disagreement) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Precision (High Disagreement)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/flagging-high-human-disagreement-cases-on-measuring-hate-speech-corpus.md?metric=Precision%20(High%20Disagreement)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall (High Disagreement)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/flagging-high-human-disagreement-cases-on-measuring-hate-speech-corpus.md?metric=Recall%20(High%20Disagreement)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score (High Disagreement)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/flagging-high-human-disagreement-cases-on-measuring-hate-speech-corpus.md?metric=F1%20Score%20(High%20Disagreement)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Precision (High Disagreement) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Category-based escalation | 40.1 | Not recorded | 69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2 |
| Divergence Only | 34.7 | Not recorded | 69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2 |
| Random Baseline | 33.3 | Not recorded | 69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2 |

### Category-based escalation

Precision (High Disagreement): 40.1. Result ID: 69d4c0ad47f34ce924bc89db.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Divergence Only

Precision (High Disagreement): 34.7. Result ID: 69d4c0ad47f34ce924bc89dc.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Random Baseline

Precision (High Disagreement): 33.3. Result ID: 69d4c0ad47f34ce924bc89dd.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69d48f6e7d0172140ec741e2.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
