# Fingerspelling detection on ChicagoFSWild+ 1.0 (test)

Source: [Fingerspelling detection on ChicagoFSWild+ 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:23:06.497Z

Evaluation of Fingerspelling Detection performance on the test split of the ChicagoFSWild+ 1.0 dataset, measured using Average Precision (AP) across various IoU and Accuracy thresholds, and Mean Segment Area (MSA).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Fingerspelling detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ChicagoFSWild+ 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | AP (IoU=0.1) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 2 of 2 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [AP (IoU=0.1)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=AP%20(IoU%3D0.1)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (IoU=0.3)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=AP%20(IoU%3D0.3)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (IoU=0.5)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=AP%20(IoU%3D0.5)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (Acc=0.0)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=AP%20(Acc%3D0.0)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (Acc=0.2)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=AP%20(Acc%3D0.2)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [AP (Acc=0.4)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=AP%20(Acc%3D0.4)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [MSA (Mean Segment Area)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fingerspelling-detection-on-chicagofswild-plus-1-0-test.md?metric=MSA%20(Mean%20Segment%20Area)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | AP (IoU=0.1) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| BMN | 58 | Not recorded | 68fa69b41e209131cea239aa |
| MS-TCN | 42.9 | Not recorded | 68fa69b41e209131cea239aa |

### BMN

AP (IoU=0.1): 58. Result ID: 698dda8dffc3901de09919b2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69b41e209131cea239aa.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa660f1e209131cea0df89.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MS-TCN

AP (IoU=0.1): 42.9. Result ID: 698dda8dffc3901de09919b3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69b41e209131cea239aa.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa684d1e209131cea1b430.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.