# File-level Malicious Code Detection on Malicious Package JavaScript (full val)

Source: [File-level Malicious Code Detection on Malicious Package JavaScript (full val)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/file-level-malicious-code-detection-on-malicious-package-javascript-full-val>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-09T07:03:01.435Z

Evaluation of model performance for file-level malicious code detection using the full validation set of the Malicious Package JavaScript dataset.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | File-level Malicious Code Detection |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Malicious Package JavaScript, File-level (full val) |
| Metric | Precision |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Precision](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/file-level-malicious-code-detection-on-malicious-package-javascript-full-val.md?metric=Precision>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Recall](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/file-level-malicious-code-detection-on-malicious-package-javascript-full-val.md?metric=Recall>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [F1 Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/file-level-malicious-code-detection-on-malicious-package-javascript-full-val.md?metric=F1%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Precision | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| MOLOT | 90.8 | Not recorded | 6a279de790966ade919bf543 |
| semgrep | 56.4 | Not recorded | 6a279de790966ade919bf543 |
| ossgadget | 19.4 | Not recorded | 6a279de790966ade919bf543 |

### MOLOT

Precision: 90.8. Result ID: 6a27ba14fbc373592c23f50d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279de790966ade919bf543.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279de790966ade919bf543.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ecosystem":"JavaScript","Support":"32292","Evaluation Protocol":"End-to-end evaluation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### semgrep

Precision: 56.4. Result ID: 6a27ba14fbc373592c23f50f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279de790966ade919bf543.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ecosystem":"JavaScript","Support":"31746","Evaluation Protocol":"End-to-end evaluation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ossgadget

Precision: 19.4. Result ID: 6a27ba14fbc373592c23f50e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a279de790966ade919bf543.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Ecosystem":"JavaScript","Support":"32292","Evaluation Protocol":"End-to-end evaluation"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.