# Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning on CIFAR100-C (Sessions 0-8) Source: [Few-Shot Class Incremental Learning on CIFAR100-C (Sessions 0-8)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-24T13:47:49.332Z Evaluation of Few-Shot Class-Incremental Learning performance on the CIFAR-100-C dataset, tracking accuracy across sequential learning sessions (Session 0 through Session 8). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Few-shot class incremental learning | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CIFAR100-C | | Metric | Accuracy (Session 0) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (Session 0)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 1)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 2)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 3)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 4)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 5)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 6)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 7)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (Session 8)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Average Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (Session 0) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | TEEN | 76.55 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | | RSGS | 76.55 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | | FACT | 76.03 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | | CEC | 75.91 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | | ProtoNet | 72.31 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | | TOPIC | 70.42 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | | iCaRL | 69.42 | Not recorded | 68fa792c1e209131cea7c665 | ### TEEN Accuracy (Session 0): 76.55. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### RSGS Accuracy (Session 0): 76.55. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FACT Accuracy (Session 0): 76.03. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CEC Accuracy (Session 0): 75.91. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ProtoNet Accuracy (Session 0): 72.31. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TOPIC Accuracy (Session 0): 70.42. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### iCaRL Accuracy (Session 0): 69.42. Result ID: 69c295fa47f34ce924aafbb0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.