# Fair Classification on CelebA corrupted level-3 Gaussian noise (test)

Source: [Fair Classification on CelebA corrupted level-3 Gaussian noise (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fair-classification-on-celeba-corrupted-level-3-gaussian-noise-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-23T06:34:55.291Z

Evaluation of fair classification performance on the test split of the CelebA dataset corrupted with level-3 Gaussian noise, measured using fairness-specific metrics like Acc s+, Acc s-, Delta Acc, and Delta p.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Fair Classification |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | CelebA corrupted level-3 Gaussian noise (test) |
| Metric | Accuracy (s+) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 8 of 8 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Accuracy (s+)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fair-classification-on-celeba-corrupted-level-3-gaussian-noise-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(s%2B)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy (s-)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fair-classification-on-celeba-corrupted-level-3-gaussian-noise-test.md?metric=Accuracy%20(s-)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fair-classification-on-celeba-corrupted-level-3-gaussian-noise-test.md?metric=Accuracy>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Delta Accuracy](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fair-classification-on-celeba-corrupted-level-3-gaussian-noise-test.md?metric=Delta%20Accuracy>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Delta p](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/fair-classification-on-celeba-corrupted-level-3-gaussian-noise-test.md?metric=Delta%20p>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Accuracy (s+) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Vanilla | 97.63 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| MSAM | 97.31 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| FairReg | 97.23 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| Reweighed | 97.01 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| GroupSAM | 96.86 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| SAM | 96.29 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| FairSAM | 95.32 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |
| GroupDRO | 91.32 | Not recorded | 68fa77be1e209131cea750f9 |

### Vanilla

Accuracy (s+): 97.63. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce68.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MSAM

Accuracy (s+): 97.31. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce6d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7bc61e209131cea8a5c1.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FairReg

Accuracy (s+): 97.23. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce69.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa63371e209131ce9fd7c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Reweighed

Accuracy (s+): 97.01. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce6a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GroupSAM

Accuracy (s+): 96.86. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce6e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa705b1e209131cea4a93e.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### SAM

Accuracy (s+): 96.29. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce6c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa69d81e209131cea248fb.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/google-research/sam>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### FairSAM

Accuracy (s+): 95.32. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce6f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GroupDRO

Accuracy (s+): 91.32. Result ID: 6a3a2906fbc373592c33ce6b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa77be1e209131cea750f9.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67561e209131cea159c7.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Test Data":"corrupted"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
