# Facial Expression Recognition on OuluCASIA Source: [Facial Expression Recognition on OuluCASIA]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:31:58.619Z Evaluation of Facial Expression Recognition performance using the OuluCASIA dataset, reporting Accuracy. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Facial expression recognition | | Dataset (including any stated split) | OuluCASIA | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 17 of 17 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Static MTL | 89.6 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | Proposed dynamic MTL | 89.6 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | Naive dynamic MTL | 88.89 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | DDL | 88.26 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | | FDRL | 88.26 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | | DeRL | 88 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | | FN2EN | 87.71 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | | Baseline | 86.18 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | | Single-task | 85.42 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | PPDN | 84.59 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | DTAGN | 81.46 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | ConvLSTM1D-based Facial Expression Recognition | 79 | Not recorded | 69365b6cd6b0dd3342934b10 | | Jung et al. (DTGN) | 74.17 | Not recorded | 69365b6cd6b0dd3342934b10 | | AdaLBP | 73.54 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | PPDN | 72.4 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | | HOG3D | 70.63 | Not recorded | 68fa66991e209131cea113d4 | | IPA2LT | 61.49 | Not recorded | 68fa69c91e209131cea23fd2 | ### Static MTL Accuracy: 89.6. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24af. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Proposed dynamic MTL Accuracy: 89.6. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24b1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Naive dynamic MTL Accuracy: 88.89. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24b0. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DDL Accuracy: 88.26. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d32. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FDRL Accuracy: 88.26. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d34. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DeRL Accuracy: 88. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d30. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FN2EN Accuracy: 87.71. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d31. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Baseline Accuracy: 86.18. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d33. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Single-task Accuracy: 85.42. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24ae. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PPDN Accuracy: 84.59. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24ad. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DTAGN Accuracy: 81.46. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24ac. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ConvLSTM1D-based Facial Expression Recognition Accuracy: 79. Result ID: 699887ef5698665ec4e95ec5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Features":"Geometric"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Jung et al. (DTGN) Accuracy: 74.17. Result ID: 699887ef5698665ec4e95ec4. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Features":"Geometric"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### AdaLBP Accuracy: 73.54. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24ab. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PPDN Accuracy: 72.4. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d2e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### HOG3D Accuracy: 70.63. Result ID: 698cfb038b517eb4331e24aa. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### IPA2LT Accuracy: 61.49. Result ID: 698de247ffc3901de0995d2f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.