# Explanation Quality Evaluation on DFD 100 randomly selected samples (test)

Source: [Explanation Quality Evaluation on DFD 100 randomly selected samples (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/explanation-quality-evaluation-on-dfd-100-randomly-selected-samples-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-16T07:53:20.519Z

Evaluation of model explanation quality using 100 randomly selected test samples from the DFD dataset. Metrics include scores from GPT-4o and Gemini 2.5 Pro.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Explanation Quality Evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | DFD 100 randomly selected samples (test) |
| Metric | GPT-4o Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 3 of 3 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [GPT-4o Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/explanation-quality-evaluation-on-dfd-100-randomly-selected-samples-test.md?metric=GPT-4o%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Gemini 2.5 Pro Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/explanation-quality-evaluation-on-dfd-100-randomly-selected-samples-test.md?metric=Gemini%202.5%20Pro%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Average Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/explanation-quality-evaluation-on-dfd-100-randomly-selected-samples-test.md?metric=Average%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | GPT-4o Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| VRAG-DFD | 7.55 | Not recorded | 69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959 |
| Gemini 2.5 Pro | 7.31 | Not recorded | 69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959 |
| GPT-4o | 4.6 | Not recorded | 69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959 |

### VRAG-DFD

GPT-4o Score: 7.55. Result ID: 69e094c647f34ce924c99b47.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gemini 2.5 Pro

GPT-4o Score: 7.31. Result ID: 69e094c647f34ce924c99b46.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GPT-4o

GPT-4o Score: 4.6. Result ID: 69e094c647f34ce924c99b45.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69e06cf97d0172140ec7c959.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
