# Explanation Matching on CUB-200 User Study 2011 (test) Source: [Explanation Matching on CUB-200 User Study 2011 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-12T10:01:04.964Z Evaluation of model performance on Explanation Matching using the test split of the CUB-200 User Study 2011 dataset, reporting Accuracy and p-value. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Explanation Matching | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CUB-200 User Study 2011 (test) | | Metric | Accuracy | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [p-value](): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | LucidPPN | 68 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | | InfoDisent | 65 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | | ProtoConcepts | 62 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | | PIPNet | 60 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | | EPIC | 55 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | | ProtoPNet | 52 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | | ProDG | 37 | Not recorded | 6a02b406dbc836b87d824603 | ### LucidPPN Accuracy: 68. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d3e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### InfoDisent Accuracy: 65. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d3a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ProtoConcepts Accuracy: 62. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d3c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PIPNet Accuracy: 60. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d3d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### EPIC Accuracy: 55. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d39. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ProtoPNet Accuracy: 52. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d3b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ProDG Accuracy: 37. Result ID: 6a02fa3047f34ce924e63d38. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.