# Evidence Identification on ArchEHR-QA (test) Source: [Evidence Identification on ArchEHR-QA (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-12T16:55:33.708Z Evaluation of model performance on the test split of the ArchEHR-QA dataset for the Evidence Identification task, measured using comprehensive Strict and Lenient Micro/Macro Precision, Recall, and F1 scores. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Evidence Identification | | Dataset (including any stated split) | ArchEHR-QA 2026 (test) | | Metric | Overall Score | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 6 of 6 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Overall Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Strict Micro Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Strict Micro Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Strict Micro F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lenient Micro Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lenient Micro Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lenient Micro F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Strict Macro Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Strict Macro Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Strict Macro F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lenient Macro Precision](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lenient Macro Recall](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Lenient Macro F1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Overall Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Neural1.5 | 63.7 | Not recorded | 6a02b4b2dbc836b87d824f95 | | OptiMed | 63.2 | Not recorded | 6a02b4b2dbc836b87d824f95 | | UIC-AIHealth4All | 62.9 | Not recorded | 6a02b4b2dbc836b87d824f95 | | Yale-DM-Lab | 61.9 | Not recorded | 6a02b4b2dbc836b87d824f95 | | TJU222 | 61.4 | Not recorded | 6a02b4b2dbc836b87d824f95 | | TAMU-NLP-Lab | 60.9 | Not recorded | 6a02b4b2dbc836b87d824f95 | ### Neural1.5 Overall Score: 63.7. Result ID: 6a035b6a47f34ce924e8f9bf. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### OptiMed Overall Score: 63.2. Result ID: 6a035b6a47f34ce924e8f9c0. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### UIC-AIHealth4All Overall Score: 62.9. Result ID: 6a035b6a47f34ce924e8f9c1. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yale-DM-Lab Overall Score: 61.9. Result ID: 6a035b6a47f34ce924e8f9c2. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TJU222 Overall Score: 61.4. Result ID: 6a035b6a47f34ce924e8f9c3. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TAMU-NLP-Lab Overall Score: 60.9. Result ID: 6a035b6a47f34ce924e8f9c4. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.