# End-to-End Text Spotting on Street View Text (SVT) (test) Source: [End-to-End Text Spotting on Street View Text (SVT) (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:42:57.662Z Evaluation of End-to-End Text Spotting performance on the test split of the Street View Text (SVT) dataset, measured using F-measure. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | End-to-End Text Spotting | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Street View Text (SVT) (test) | | Metric | F1 Score | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 9 of 9 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [F1 Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | F1 Score | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Proposed | 0.82 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Proposed | 0.76 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Proposed | 0.57 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Jaderberg | 0.56 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Proposed | 0.53 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Alsharif | 0.48 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Wang & Wu | 0.46 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Neumann | 0.41 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | | Wang | 0.38 | Not recorded | 68fa619d1e209131ce9f5286 | ### Proposed F1 Score: 0.82. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb771755d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word","IoU threshold":0.3}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Proposed F1 Score: 0.76. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb771755b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Proposed F1 Score: 0.57. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb771755e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"None","IoU threshold":0.3}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Jaderberg F1 Score: 0.56. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb771755a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Proposed F1 Score: 0.53. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb771755c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"None"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Alsharif F1 Score: 0.48. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb7717559. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Wang & Wu F1 Score: 0.46. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb7717558. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Neumann F1 Score: 0.41. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb7717556. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Wang F1 Score: 0.38. Result ID: 698bcd5c7a967eddb7717557. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Lexicon":"50-word"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.