# Dynamic Surface Reconstruction on DT4D (test)

Source: [Dynamic Surface Reconstruction on DT4D (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dynamic-surface-reconstruction-on-dt4d-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-03-26T14:07:48.550Z

Evaluation of dynamic surface reconstruction performance on the test split of the DT4D dataset, reporting metrics including Chamfer Distance (CD), Normal Consistency (NC), Fidelity (F-0.5%), Correspondence (Corr.), and processing time.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Dynamic Surface Reconstruction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | DT4D (test) |
| Metric | Chamfer Distance (CD) |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Lower is better |
| Results loaded | 6 of 6 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Chamfer Distance (CD)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dynamic-surface-reconstruction-on-dt4d-test.md?metric=Chamfer%20Distance%20(CD)>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Normal Consistency (NC)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dynamic-surface-reconstruction-on-dt4d-test.md?metric=Normal%20Consistency%20(NC)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Fidelity (F-0.5%)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dynamic-surface-reconstruction-on-dt4d-test.md?metric=Fidelity%20(F-0.5%25)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Correspondence (Corr.)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dynamic-surface-reconstruction-on-dt4d-test.md?metric=Correspondence%20(Corr.)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Processing Time (s)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dynamic-surface-reconstruction-on-dt4d-test.md?metric=Processing%20Time%20(s)>): Lower is better; unit: TIME.

## Recorded results

| Method | Chamfer Distance (CD) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Neu-PiG | 0.87 | Not recorded | 699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079 |
| Neu-PiG | 0.96 | Not recorded | 699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079 |
| PDG | 1.67 | Not recorded | 699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079 |
| M2V | 7.61 | Not recorded | 699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079 |
| DynoSurf | 15.18 | Not recorded | 699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079 |
| CaDeX | 56.51 | Not recorded | 699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079 |

### Neu-PiG

Chamfer Distance (CD): 0.87. Result ID: 69c53d9947f34ce924af07f4.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization strategy (Training-free vs Learning-based)":"Training-free","Optimization length (epochs)":"1000"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Neu-PiG

Chamfer Distance (CD): 0.96. Result ID: 69c53d9947f34ce924af07f3.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization strategy (Training-free vs Learning-based)":"Training-free","Optimization length (epochs)":"250"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### PDG

Chamfer Distance (CD): 1.67. Result ID: 69c53d9947f34ce924af07f2.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa7b891e209131cea88fbb.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization strategy (Training-free vs Learning-based)":"Training-free"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### M2V

Chamfer Distance (CD): 7.61. Result ID: 69c53d9947f34ce924af07f1.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa72d91e209131cea58e5e.md>)

[Implementation](<https://vveicao.github.io/projects/Motion2VecSets>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization strategy (Training-free vs Learning-based)":"Learning-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DynoSurf

Chamfer Distance (CD): 15.18. Result ID: 69c53d9947f34ce924af07f0.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa74361e209131cea6076a.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization strategy (Training-free vs Learning-based)":"Training-free"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CaDeX

Chamfer Distance (CD): 56.51. Result ID: 69c53d9947f34ce924af07ef.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/699fd39f2d603e6de3e3c079.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6c331e209131cea32c60.md>)

[Implementation](<https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~leijh/projects/cadex>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Optimization strategy (Training-free vs Learning-based)":"Learning-based"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
