# Domain Generalization on PACS 2→2 generalization Source: [Domain Generalization on PACS 2→2 generalization]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:34:04.373Z Evaluation of Domain Generalization performance on the PACS dataset using a specific 2-source to 2-target domain transfer protocol, reporting mean accuracy and specific transfer accuracies. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Domain Generalization | | Dataset (including any stated split) | PACS 2→2 domain generalization | | Metric | Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (A+P -\> C+S)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (A+S -\> C+P)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (C+P -\> A+S)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (C+S -\> A+P)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy (P+S -\> A+C)](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Mean Accuracy](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MMD | 92.58 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | PNS | 91.38 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | CaSN(IRM) | 91.25 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | MLDG | 91.14 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | CDANN | 90.35 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | GroupDRO | 89.93 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | IRM | 89.87 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | | ERM | 86.78 | Not recorded | 697ae97aa2b28e761d87cfaf | ### MMD Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 92.58. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e466b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### PNS Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 91.38. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e466e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CaSN(IRM) Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 91.25. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e466d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### MLDG Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 91.14. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e466a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CDANN Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 90.35. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e466c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GroupDRO Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 89.93. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e4669. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### IRM Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 89.87. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e4668. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### ERM Accuracy (A+C -\> P+S): 86.78. Result ID: 699908c65698665ec46e4667. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.