# Documentation quality evaluation on ClinicalBench 1.0 (test)

Source: [Documentation quality evaluation on ClinicalBench 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/documentation-quality-evaluation-on-clinicalbench-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-04-13T08:19:49.192Z

Evaluation of model performance on assessing documentation quality using the test split of the ClinicalBench 1.0 dataset, measured by metrics such as IDEA, SOAP, READ, and chrF++.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Documentation quality evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | ClinicalBench 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | IDEA Score |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 19 of 19 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [IDEA Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/documentation-quality-evaluation-on-clinicalbench-1-0-test.md?metric=IDEA%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [SOAP Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/documentation-quality-evaluation-on-clinicalbench-1-0-test.md?metric=SOAP%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [READ Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/documentation-quality-evaluation-on-clinicalbench-1-0-test.md?metric=READ%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [chrF++ Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/documentation-quality-evaluation-on-clinicalbench-1-0-test.md?metric=chrF%2B%2B%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | IDEA Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Aegle | 72.78 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| MDAgents | 68.41 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| ToT | 66.53 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| CoT | 64.72 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Qwen3-Max | 61.75 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| MedAgents | 59.85 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| MiniMax-M2 | 57.78 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Kimi K2 Thinking | 54.05 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Doubao-Seed-1.6 | 51.51 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| DeepSeek-V3.2 | 50.51 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Lingshu-32B | 50.5 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Gemini 2.5 | 48.35 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| ERNIE-5.0-Preview | 47.09 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| GLM-4.6 | 47.02 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Thinking | 46.73 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| HuatuoGPT-o1-7B | 46.54 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Qwen3-8B-think | 43.18 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| GPT-4o | 41.05 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |
| Baichuan-M2-32B | 38.02 | Not recorded | 69dc785a7d0172140ec788be |

### Aegle

IDEA Score: 72.78. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38446.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Ours"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MDAgents

IDEA Score: 68.41. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38444.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa75761e209131cea6818c.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/mitmedialab/MDAgents>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Medical multi-agent system"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ToT

IDEA Score: 66.53. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38443.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa71551e209131cea50930.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/princeton-nlp/tree-of-thought-llm>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Reasoning-strategy baseline"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### CoT

IDEA Score: 64.72. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38442.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6e571e209131cea3f27b.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Reasoning-strategy baseline"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen3-Max

IDEA Score: 61.75. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c3843f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Proprietary":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MedAgents

IDEA Score: 59.85. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38445.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa73701e209131cea5c7d9.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/gersteinlab/MedAgents>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Method Category":"Medical multi-agent system"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### MiniMax-M2

IDEA Score: 57.78. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c3843c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Kimi K2 Thinking

IDEA Score: 54.05. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c3843b.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Doubao-Seed-1.6

IDEA Score: 51.51. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38440.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Proprietary":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DeepSeek-V3.2

IDEA Score: 50.51. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38438.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/692fc410d6b0dd33429332f4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Lingshu-32B

IDEA Score: 50.5. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38437.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true","Medical-domain":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Gemini 2.5

IDEA Score: 48.35. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c3843e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Proprietary":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### ERNIE-5.0-Preview

IDEA Score: 47.09. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38441.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Proprietary":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GLM-4.6

IDEA Score: 47.02. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c3843a.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### DeepSeek-V3.2-Thinking

IDEA Score: 46.73. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38439.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/692fc410d6b0dd33429332f4.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### HuatuoGPT-o1-7B

IDEA Score: 46.54. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38434.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true","Medical-domain":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Qwen3-8B-think

IDEA Score: 43.18. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38435.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### GPT-4o

IDEA Score: 41.05. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c3843d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Proprietary":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Baichuan-M2-32B

IDEA Score: 38.02. Result ID: 69dca5eb47f34ce924c38436.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/69dc785a7d0172140ec788be.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Open-source":"true","Medical-domain":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
