# Diversity on Online A/B Re-Ranking (test) Source: [Diversity on Online A/B Re-Ranking (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-05-01T06:32:53.387Z Evaluation of model performance focusing on Diversity metrics within an online A/B testing framework for a re-ranking system, using the specified test set. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Diversity | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Online A/B Re-Ranking (test) | | Metric | Engagement Rate 1 | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 1 of 1 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Engagement Rate 1](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Engagement Rate 2](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Diversity Score](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Engagement Rate 1 | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | AgenticRecTune | 21 | Not recorded | 69f4338455a3c32af89fd08b | ### AgenticRecTune Engagement Rate 1: 21. Result ID: 69f448c247f34ce924d9aa6d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Stage":"Re-Ranking"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.