# Dimensionality Reduction on Clinical Dataset Abdominal Pain (train+test)

Source: [Dimensionality Reduction on Clinical Dataset Abdominal Pain (train+test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dimensionality-reduction-on-clinical-dataset-abdominal-pain-train-plus-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-06-04T11:59:48.197Z

Evaluation of dimensionality reduction techniques applied to the Clinical Dataset Abdominal Pain (train+test split), assessed using specific Trustworthiness metrics (T5, T30, T150).

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Dimensionality Reduction |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Clinical Dataset Abdominal Pain (train+test) |
| Metric | Trustworthiness (T5) |
| Unit | PERCENT |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 5 of 5 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Trustworthiness (T5)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dimensionality-reduction-on-clinical-dataset-abdominal-pain-train-plus-test.md?metric=Trustworthiness%20(T5)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Trustworthiness (T30)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dimensionality-reduction-on-clinical-dataset-abdominal-pain-train-plus-test.md?metric=Trustworthiness%20(T30)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

- [Trustworthiness (T150)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dimensionality-reduction-on-clinical-dataset-abdominal-pain-train-plus-test.md?metric=Trustworthiness%20(T150)>): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT.

## Recorded results

| Method | Trustworthiness (T5) | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| P-UMAP-CE | 87.3 | Not recorded | 6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab |
| UMAP | 83.62 | Not recorded | 6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab |
| P-UMAP-CEMSE | 83.5 | Not recorded | 6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab |
| UMAP | 83.38 | Not recorded | 6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab |
| P-UMAP-MSE | 82 | Not recorded | 6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab |

### P-UMAP-CE

Trustworthiness (T5): 87.3. Result ID: 6a21689afbc373592c1e5d22.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### UMAP

Trustworthiness (T5): 83.62. Result ID: 6a21689afbc373592c1e5d1f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68501e209131cea1b5d2.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/lmcinnes/umap>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Negative sampling (ns)":"3"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### P-UMAP-CEMSE

Trustworthiness (T5): 83.5. Result ID: 6a21689afbc373592c1e5d21.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### UMAP

Trustworthiness (T5): 83.38. Result ID: 6a21689afbc373592c1e5d1e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa68501e209131cea1b5d2.md>)

[Implementation](<https://github.com/lmcinnes/umap>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Negative sampling (ns)":"5"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### P-UMAP-MSE

Trustworthiness (T5): 82. Result ID: 6a21689afbc373592c1e5d20.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/6a2106f8c10484bac23f06ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.