# Dialogue Style Transfer on Anime-style dialogue evaluation set (test) Source: [Dialogue Style Transfer on Anime-style dialogue evaluation set (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-09T07:50:56.098Z Evaluation of Dialogue Style Transfer performance on the test split of the Anime-style dialogue evaluation set, measured using Semantic similarity, Style Logic, and Naturalness scores. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Dialogue Style Transfer | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Anime-style dialogue evaluation set (test) | | Metric | Semantic Similarity | | Unit | SCALAR | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 7 of 7 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Semantic Similarity](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Style Logic Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. - [Naturalness Score](): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR. ## Recorded results | Method | Semantic Similarity | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Baseline D | 4.4 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | | Model v2 | 4.29 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | | Model v2 | 3.87 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | | Model v1 | 3.75 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | | Baseline C | 3.12 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | | Baseline B | 3 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | | Baseline A | 1.63 | Not recorded | 69ae53d92d603e6de3e42817 | ### Baseline D Semantic Similarity: 4.4. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df4. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"mode":"Prompt-based under strong constraints"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model v2 Semantic Similarity: 4.29. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df1. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"inference-only":"true"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model v2 Semantic Similarity: 3.87. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df2. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Model v1 Semantic Similarity: 3.75. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df3. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Baseline C Semantic Similarity: 3.12. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df6. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"methodology":"Vanilla SFT"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Baseline B Semantic Similarity: 3. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df7. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Baseline A Semantic Similarity: 1.63. Result ID: 69ae7bd06dbb7075b9565df5. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"methodology":"RAG"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.