# Dialogue Evaluation on Ice-breaker human evaluation 1.0 (test)

Source: [Dialogue Evaluation on Ice-breaker human evaluation 1.0 (test)](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test>)

Collection index: [llms.txt](<https://www.sota2.com/research/llms.txt>)

Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:54:32.783Z

Subjective human evaluation of dialogue quality on the Ice-breaker human evaluation 1.0 test set, focusing on metrics related to engagement, consistency, fluency, and topic adherence.

A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage.

| Scope | Recorded value |
| --- | --- |
| Task | Dialogue Evaluation |
| Dataset (including any stated split) | Ice-breaker human evaluation 1.0 (test) |
| Metric | Overall Score |
| Unit | SCALAR |
| Direction | Higher is better |
| Results loaded | 10 of 10 |
| Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark |

Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol.

## Metrics

- [Overall Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Overall%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Interestingness](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Interestingness>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Fun Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Fun%20Score>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Consistency](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Consistency>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Fluency](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Fluency>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Topic Adherence](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Topic%20Adherence>): Higher is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Robotic Score](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Robotic%20Score>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

- [Repetitiveness](<https://www.sota2.com/research/sota/dialogue-evaluation-on-ice-breaker-human-evaluation-1-0-test.md?metric=Repetitiveness>): Lower is better; unit: SCALAR.

## Recorded results

| Method | Overall Score | Result date | Report paper |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Model A | 0.552 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model A | 0.422 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model B | 0.376 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model C | 0.322 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model B | 0.273 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model C | 0.222 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model D | -0.139 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model E | -0.198 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model E | -0.24 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |
| Model D | -0.267 | Not recorded | 68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab |

### Model A

Overall Score: 0.552. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff96c.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65651e209131cea09f24.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":721,"persona":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model A

Overall Score: 0.422. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff96d.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa65651e209131cea09f24.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":742,"persona":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model B

Overall Score: 0.376. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff96e.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67411e209131cea1548c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":721,"persona":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model C

Overall Score: 0.322. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff96f.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62d51e209131ce9fb76c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":784,"persona":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model B

Overall Score: 0.273. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff970.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa67411e209131cea1548c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":658,"persona":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model C

Overall Score: 0.222. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff971.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa62d51e209131ce9fb76c.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":700,"persona":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model D

Overall Score: -0.139. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff972.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa619e1e209131ce9f5369.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":728,"persona":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model E

Overall Score: -0.198. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff973.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":714,"persona":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model E

Overall Score: -0.24. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff974.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":721,"persona":false}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

### Model D

Overall Score: -0.267. Result ID: 698eb530ffc3901de09ff975.

[Reporting paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa6bfd1e209131cea317ab.md>)

[Method origin paper](<https://www.sota2.com/research/paper/68fa619e1e209131ce9f5369.md>)

Recorded evaluation configuration: {"number of ratings":721,"persona":true}. This record does not assert independent reproduction.

Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.
