# Depth Map Super-Resolution on Middlebury Venus v1 (test) Source: [Depth Map Super-Resolution on Middlebury Venus v1 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:37:29.260Z Evaluation of Depth Map Super-Resolution performance on the test set of the Middlebury Venus v1 dataset, typically measured by metrics like Percentage of bad pixels. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Depth Map Super-Resolution | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Middlebury Venus v1 (test) | | Metric | Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 9 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 22 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 25 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 25 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 33 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 37 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 42 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 65 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 81 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Lu et al. | 100 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 119 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 124 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 190 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 9. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716460. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 22. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771645f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 25. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771645e. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 25. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716464. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 33. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716469. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 37. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771645d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 42. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716462. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 65. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716463. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 81. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716461. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lu et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 100. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716467. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 119. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716466. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 124. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716468. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixels (%) (delta=1): 190. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716465. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.