# Depth Map Super-Resolution on Middlebury Tsukuba v1 (test) Source: [Depth Map Super-Resolution on Middlebury Tsukuba v1 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:37:29.229Z Evaluation of Depth Map Super-Resolution performance using the Middlebury Tsukuba v1 test set, typically measured by metrics like Percentage of bad pixels. A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Depth Map Super-Resolution | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Middlebury Tsukuba v1 (test) | | Metric | Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 0.47 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 1.03 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 1.16 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 1.24 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 1.73 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 2.56 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 2.95 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 3.53 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 3.53 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 3.56 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Lu et al. | 5.09 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 5.59 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 6.95 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 0.47. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716453. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 1.03. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716452. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 1.16. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716451. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 1.24. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716450. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 1.73. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716457. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 2.56. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716455. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 2.95. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716456. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 3.53. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716454. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 3.53. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771645c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 3.56. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716458. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lu et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 5.09. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771645a. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 5.59. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771645b. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 6.95. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716459. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.