# Depth Map Super-Resolution on Middlebury Cones v1 (test) Source: [Depth Map Super-Resolution on Middlebury Cones v1 (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-02-26T05:37:29.243Z Evaluation of Depth Map Super-Resolution performance using the Middlebury Cones v1 test set, typically measured by Percentage of bad pixels (delta=1). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Depth Map Super-Resolution | | Dataset (including any stated split) | Middlebury Cones v1 (test) | | Metric | Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1) | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Lower is better | | Results loaded | 13 of 13 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1)](): Lower is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1) | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 1.81 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 2.39 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 2.51 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 3.56 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 4.76 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 5.16 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 5.44 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 6.54 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | bimodal co-sparse analysis model | 9.22 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | nearest-neighbor | 10.4 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Yang et al. | 11 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Lu et al. | 11.3 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | | Hawe et al. | 12.3 | Not recorded | 68fa60dc1e209131ce9f191e | ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 1.81. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771647a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 2.39. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716478. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 2.51. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716477. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 3.56. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716479. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"2x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 4.76. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771647c. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 5.16. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771647e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 5.44. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771647b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 6.54. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771647d. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"4x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### bimodal co-sparse analysis model Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 9.22. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716483. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### nearest-neighbor Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 10.4. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb771647f. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Yang et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 11. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716480. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Lu et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 11.3. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716481. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Hawe et al. Bad Pixel Rate (delta=1): 12.3. Result ID: 698bcaff7a967eddb7716482. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: {"Upscaling factor (d)":"8x"}. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.