# Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization on CVOGL-SVI (val) Source: [Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization on CVOGL-SVI (val)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-17T08:50:24.434Z Evaluation of Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization performance on the validation split of the CVOGL-SVI dataset, measured using accuracy metrics (acc@0.25, acc@0.5). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CVOGL-SVI (val) | | Metric | Accuracy@0.25 | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy@0.25](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy@0.5](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy@0.25 | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MOGeo | 49.51 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | VAGeo | 47.56 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | DetGeo | 46.7 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | GeoDTR | 31.53 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | TransGeo | 21.67 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | Sample4Geo | 11.48 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | FRGeo | 7.8 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | CVM-Net | 5.09 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | ### MOGeo Accuracy@0.25: 49.51. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b932. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VAGeo Accuracy@0.25: 47.56. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b931. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DetGeo Accuracy@0.25: 46.7. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b930. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GeoDTR Accuracy@0.25: 31.53. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b92e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TransGeo Accuracy@0.25: 21.67. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b92c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Sample4Geo Accuracy@0.25: 11.48. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b92f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FRGeo Accuracy@0.25: 7.8. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b92d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CVM-Net Accuracy@0.25: 5.09. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b92b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.