# Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization on CVOGL-SVI (test) Source: [Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization on CVOGL-SVI (test)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-17T08:50:24.409Z Evaluation of Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization performance on the test split of the CVOGL-SVI dataset, measured using accuracy metrics (acc@0.25, acc@0.5). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CVOGL-SVI (test) | | Metric | Accuracy @ 0.25 | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy @ 0.25](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy @ 0.5](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy @ 0.25 | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MOGeo | 50.98 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | VAGeo | 48.21 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | DetGeo | 45.43 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | GeoDTR | 32.37 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | TransGeo | 21.17 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | Sample4Geo | 8.84 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | FRGeo | 8.12 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | CVM-Net | 4.73 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | ### MOGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 50.98. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b92a. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VAGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 48.21. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b929. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DetGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 45.43. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b928. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GeoDTR Accuracy @ 0.25: 32.37. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b926. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TransGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 21.17. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b924. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Sample4Geo Accuracy @ 0.25: 8.84. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b927. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FRGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 8.12. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b925. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CVM-Net Accuracy @ 0.25: 4.73. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b923. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.