# Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization on CVOGL-Drone (val) Source: [Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization on CVOGL-Drone (val)]() Collection index: [llms.txt]() Data updated: 2026-03-17T08:50:24.486Z Evaluation of Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization performance on the validation split of the CVOGL-Drone dataset, measured using accuracy metrics (acc@0.25, acc@0.5). A research result applies to its stated dataset, split, metric and evaluation configuration. Compare like-for-like settings, preserve the metric's unit and direction, and distinguish paper-reported results from independent reproduction. The best result recorded here is not a claim of exhaustive, current global coverage. | Scope | Recorded value | | --- | --- | | Task | Cross-View Single-Object Geo-Localization | | Dataset (including any stated split) | CVOGL-Drone (val) | | Metric | Accuracy @ 0.25 | | Unit | PERCENT | | Direction | Higher is better | | Results loaded | 8 of 8 | | Coverage | All results currently returned for this benchmark | Evaluation settings may differ between results. The original papers and recorded configurations are needed to establish comparability. A shared metric name alone does not establish an identical protocol. ## Metrics - [Accuracy @ 0.25](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. - [Accuracy @ 0.5](): Higher is better; unit: PERCENT. ## Recorded results | Method | Accuracy @ 0.25 | Result date | Report paper | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | MOGeo | 65.11 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | VAGeo | 64.25 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | DetGeo | 59.81 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | TransGeo | 34.78 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | GeoDTR | 31.13 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | CVM-Net | 20.04 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | FRGeo | 13.22 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | | Sample4Geo | 11.16 | Not recorded | 69b8dff00636e5bf4afbe89d | ### MOGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 65.11. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b942. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### VAGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 64.25. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b941. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### DetGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 59.81. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b940. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### TransGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 34.78. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b93c. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() [Implementation]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### GeoDTR Accuracy @ 0.25: 31.13. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b93e. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### CVM-Net Accuracy @ 0.25: 20.04. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b93b. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### FRGeo Accuracy @ 0.25: 13.22. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b93d. [Reporting paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. ### Sample4Geo Accuracy @ 0.25: 11.16. Result ID: 69b9150d47f34ce924a1b93f. [Reporting paper]() [Method origin paper]() Recorded evaluation configuration: Not recorded. This record does not assert independent reproduction. Page 1 of 1. This is an index page, not the full collection.